| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Crime and NO punishment - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Galaxy Pig wrote: Link the thread and the post# man, not everyone reads every post on C&P... Just read it from the horse's mouth: Jestertrek wrote: [Editorial] This more or less confirms Endie pushed the wreck HP change to CCP strictl...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.06.24 16:20:36
|
2. Rules on multiboxing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lillith Dragonia wrote: It's to my understanding that multiboxing is allowed as long as i don't relay commands over to other accounts without actually touching them. Correct Lillith Dragonia wrote: Now, is it still allowed to use a progra...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.06.04 23:06:49
|
3. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Step one: Ruin the Rorqual for small and medium groups while making it absurdly overpowered for huge groups (November patch) Steps two to five: Ruin the Rorqual for huge groups as well Somehow I fail to see the point in all of this.
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.06.01 22:32:48
|
4. Announcement:119.5 - General Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nana Skalski wrote: "Move PLEX to vault" option doesnt work when PLEX is in citadel and I am in remote location. I had to go there and move plex to Vault by draggong it there. Same with PLEX located in nullsec outposts.
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.05.09 15:22:52
|
5. "PLEX can no longer be used for Character transfer fee payments... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lothros Andastar wrote: How about you fix this issue BEFORE forcing a change no-one wanted on everyone? Nah, that would set a dangerous precedent.
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.05.05 21:06:26
|
6. New Refinery Structures and Future of Low Sec Moon Mining? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
The two existing lowsec miners will have a lot of job offers.
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.26 16:04:03
|
7. More restrictions to the criminals. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Wait -10s live in LS so that is why he mentioned suicide ganking? Most HS suicide gankers have very low sec status and they either live in NS or HS. A -10 living in LS is not a ganker. He is a pirate. A -10 player cannot mo...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.26 07:02:20
|
8. More restrictions to the criminals. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Then why did he mention suicide ganking and why does he want it nerfed...as per his own words? There is no problem with ganking and there is no problem with criminals accessing HS. Everything working as intended. Because us...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.26 06:33:35
|
9. More restrictions to the criminals. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Ganking mining ships is a subsidized activity. Players gank blockade runners to play the numbers, again for profit. Other ganking is just for ***** and giggles and not common. To see this suicide ganking of new players (15 ...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.26 05:58:14
|
10. More restrictions to the criminals. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Sarah Flynt wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: To try an kill this thread.... So, business as usual for you Teckos Pech wrote: Most suicide ganks are not for ***** and giggles. Most are for profit. Citation please Yes...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.26 05:25:07
|
11. More restrictions to the criminals. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: To try an kill this thread.... So, business as usual for you Teckos Pech wrote: Most suicide ganks are not for ***** and giggles. Most are for profit. Citation please
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.26 04:49:22
|
12. More restrictions to the criminals. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: The tethering mechanic gives the same sort of in-space protection that the POS force field did. Criminals (and everyone else) have nothing new that they didn't have already with POSes in the tethering mechanic That's of cou...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.24 20:46:08
|
13. Hello, starting straight with a question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mara Pahrdi wrote: Victoria Oswald wrote: I simply can not understand that low playercount. It's a full blown mmorpg. The best stuff in this kind of games requires serious dedication. Nowadays, fewer people are willing to dedicate this muc...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.04.16 15:33:28
|
14. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ronnie Rose wrote: So far, no one has really come up with reasons on why ganking with an excessive number of mutlboxed should be left unaddressed when I can give several on why it should be addressed. Actually you haven't provided a single re...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.25 06:17:54
|
15. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'd remove the "Gank" in the thread title because what you're describing is not exclusive to ganking but applies to all forms of multiboxing where most or all chars do the same activity. The actual problem is that many activities require very litt...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.24 19:12:36
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sullen Decimus wrote: I just want to know why you think that we are told "hey guys we're going to inject a shitload of plex into the game when aurum converts" would ever equate to me wanting to go buy enough plex to jump the market up by 15%. ...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.16 23:24:38
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: Q: Why are you only converting Aurum balances above 1000? A: A large portion of the total Aurum stockpile is in small balances left over from past giveaways and by not converting those small balances we mitigate risk of oversupply in t...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.16 22:28:45
|
18. Can we get rid of CSM after the recent PLEX insider trading fiasco? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsPqwnloj7Y
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.16 22:00:23
|
19. Capital Ships restricted to Large Citadels? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mister Holder wrote: Can someone explain to me what CCP's thought process was when it restricted capital ship docking and construction to large citadels and up? money
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.12 16:04:04
|
20. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Huydo wrote: http://i.imgur.com/PtL3r61.png ~46mio/h So i tested it on the test server now. And with almost the same fitting (only tank is different ) i got less than 50mio per hour on mining. Rorq content is official DEAD now. As no one wil...
- by Sarah Flynt - at 2017.03.07 14:57:09
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |